<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     >
  <channel>
    <title>Sirius Stuff</title>
    <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/</link>
    <description>A static blog engine/compiler</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:43:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Blogofile</generator>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <item>
      <title>TipToeTurtle.com - neat concept, easy to do business with</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/tiptoeturtlecom-neat-concept-easy-to-do-business-with/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:01:01 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/tiptoeturtlecom-neat-concept-easy-to-do-business-with/</guid>
      <description>TipToeTurtle.com - neat concept, easy to do business with</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">I ordered from <a href="http://www.BicycleTrailers.com">BicycleTrailers.com</a> a <a href="http://babyjogger.com/tailwind.htm">Baby Jogger Tailwind trailer</a> that I ended up returning.   I ended up returning it mostly because it had no storage room at all.  I’m toting my son in the trailer and he needs his lunch, sometimes a change of clothes, etc.   And it’s nice to have that behind him where he can’t get at it.  The trailer itself, while a bit on the heavy side, was extremely well built and had some very nice touches compared to our <a href="http://www.burley.com">Burley</a> LadyBug trailer.  It seems likely that the Baby Jogger folks were aiming this at people who want to jog with young kids and that having no storage room was a feature, since the missing space gives a runner room for their legs to step forward.</p>
<p id="p2">Part of the packaging was a flyer from the parent company <a href="http://www.TipToeTurtle.com">TipToeTurtle.com</a> .  As well as BicycleTrailers.com, they have 8 other domain names that focus on <a href="http://www.highchairs.com">high chairs</a> or <a href="http://www.sparebed.com">travel beds</a> or <a href="http://www.childcarriers.com">child carriers</a> and so on.  They seem like a really nice, organized company.</p>
<p id="p3">I was expecting to have problems when I sent the trailer back - it’s never as easy to package it back up .   However, they were as fast and responsive with updates on receiving the trailer and processing the refund as they were on the order.   I would happily do business with them again.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kodak and their great video&#8230;</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/kodak-and-their-great-video/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:06:06 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/kodak-and-their-great-video/</guid>
      <description>Kodak and their great video&#8230;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">Found a link to this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sz6XjXu-oT8">Kodak video</a> from Jason Calacanis’ blog. His article about <a href="http://www.calacanis.com/2007/04/10/kodak-video-winds-of-change/">Kodak video… “winds of change”</a> has one word: genius.</p>
<p id="p2">It is a <strong>phenomenal</strong> video.  Too bad that <a href="http://www.kodak.com">Kodak’s web site</a> is messy and confusing and has nothing of interest to me.   For me, the video just brought home how much they don’t matter to me.  I can’t remember the last time I bought a Kodak product.  I suppose that they do sell paper and stuff like that to Walgreens or Costco or wherever I get the few photos I want on paper printed out.</p>
<p id="p3">But it could be Fuji or Xerox or whoever for all I care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buzz Monitoring and Tracking</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/buzz-monitoring-and-tracking/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 01:01:01 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/buzz-monitoring-and-tracking/</guid>
      <description>Buzz Monitoring and Tracking</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p1">Not that it applies to this blog at all but <a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2006/11/24/buzz-monitoring-observing-und-tracking/">Web 2.0: Buzz-Monitoring and Tracking | Smashing Magazine</a> is a nice write-up of some solutions and I need to look at it more closely.</p>
<p id="p2">I’ve been trying to use <a href="http://www.siriusventures.com/nice-article-on-using-google-notebook/">Google notebook</a> to track things but it’s not working so well for me.  The interface is kind of clumsy.  Need to get back and try it some more, I guess.  In the meantime, I can use the blog to call attention to articles that are useful for me and for my hordes of readers.  <img src="http://www.siriusventures.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley"/></p>
<p id="p3">
</p><p class="poweredbyperformancing" id="p4">powered by <a href="http://performancing.com/firefox">performancing firefox</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Good summary of FaceBook</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/good-summary-of-facebook/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:11:11 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Startups]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/good-summary-of-facebook/</guid>
      <description>Good summary of FaceBook</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">There’s an excellent summary of how FaceBook came to be and what its possible valuation might be at: <a href="http://www.startup-review.com/blog/facebook-case-study-offline-behavior-drives-online-usage.php">» Facebook Case Study: Offline behavior drives online usage - Startup Review Blog</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Excellent case study and analysis of HotOrNot</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/excellent-case-study-and-analysis-of-hotornot/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:11:11 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Startups]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/excellent-case-study-and-analysis-of-hotornot/</guid>
      <description>Excellent case study and analysis of HotOrNot</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p1">Nisan Gabbay has an excellent analysis of the site at <a href="http://www.startup-review.com/blog/hotornotcom-case-study-mixing-free-and-premium-services.php">HOTorNOT.com Case Study: Mixing free and premium services</a></p>
<p id="p2">My wife and I celebrated our fifth wedding anniversary a few months<br/>
ago.  I’m happily married, so I haven’t visited HotOrNot in years.   I was fascinated by the description of the dating service, which I don’t think they offered when a friend first told me about the site.  </p>
<p id="p3">“Thus HOTorNOT was able to fill some pretty basic human needs in a way<br/>
that no other online service had before. This would later translate<br/>
into financial success once HOTorNOT offered its premium dating service<br/>
because their cost of customer acquisition was so low - zero. The<br/>
largest cost associated with operating a traditional online dating site<br/>
is the cost of customer acquisition, which even for successful sites<br/>
can be 50% (or more) of revenue. Because HOTorNOT attracted users with<br/>
its free rating service, it could offer its dating service for the low<br/>
price point of $6 per month. This is a price that traditional dating<br/>
sites can’t compete with because it generally takes $15-$30 to acquire<br/>
a subscriber for a traditional dating service.”</p>
<p id="p4">I wouldn’t think that advertising would be very appealing on the site except to a few advertisers like Budweiser.  So the idea of adding dating as a way to make money seems terrific.   As the article says:</p>
<p id="p5">“Pay $30 a month to troll through profiles? Hell no! Pay $6 to contact a<br/>
hot girl who already said she thinks I’m hot too? Probably.”</p>
<p id="p6">Neat to see somebody come up with a way to compete not only with the usual paid dating sites (Match, eHarmony, Yahoo) but also with <a href="http://www.craigslist.org/">Craigs List</a> and <a href="http://www.plentyoffish.com">PlentyOfFish</a>.</p>
<p id="p7">Can’t recommend this article - if you’re into web startups - highly enough.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Good customer service costs too much?</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/good-customer-service-costs-too-much/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:11:11 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/good-customer-service-costs-too-much/</guid>
      <description>Good customer service costs too much?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">I just finished reading <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wal-Mart-Effect-Powerful-Transforming-American/dp/1594200769">The Wal-Mart Effect</a></em> by Charles Fishman.  It talks about the effect that Wal-Mart’s continual drive to lower prices is also lowering the quality of goods - to be cheaper, metal is replaced by plastic.  Repairable items are replaced by disposable.  And the quality of life for employees - of Wal-Mart or its suppliers - is simultaneously lowered, too.</p>
<p id="p2">As somebody who’s spent his fair share of time putting together desks and bookcases and children’s toys, one of the most powerful quotes was (paraphrased) “that things should be cheaper - we’re making them ourselves”.  </p>
<p id="p3">In a <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20061106/164610.shtml">post</a> on “Is it tech rage or customer service rage?”, Techcrunch talks about how many stories at “tech rage” are but asks whether they’re really caused by awful customer service.  I certainly think that’s the case.  When I see a guarantee from companies like Qwest or Comcast, I immediately discount it down to 0.  I’m sure that whatever the guarantee is, there’s something in the fine print that will prevent me from collecting.  Assuming, of course, that I have the patience to persist in reaching a person.</p>
<p id="p4">I don’t shop at Wal-Mart.  I have 3 small children and my wife and I need diapers and paper towels and formula and string cheese and lots and lots of other bulk items.  We pay money to belong to Costco for two reasons: #1, they pay their employees a decent wage and provide them good benefits.  And #2, they stand behind what they sell.  I’ve never had a problem returning something to Costco.   Costco is tiny compared to Wal-Mart but perhaps that’s why they can provide decent service.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Top 10 unintentionally worst URLs</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/top-10-unintentionally-worst-urls/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:07:07 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/top-10-unintentionally-worst-urls/</guid>
      <description>Top 10 unintentionally worst URLs</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">It’s tough coming up with a decent domain name - all the good ones are taken.  But you have to wonder what some people were thinking when they came up with these domain names:</p>
<p id="p2">Who Represents?  - www.whorepresents.com</p>
<p id="p3">Pen Island - www.penisland.com</p>
<p id="p4">and 8 <a href="http://independentsources.com/2006/07/12/worst-company-urls/">more</a> courtesy of <i>Independent Sources</i>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wal-Mart going upscale? Huh?</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/wal-mart-going-upscale-huh/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 03:03:03 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/wal-mart-going-upscale-huh/</guid>
      <description>Wal-Mart going upscale? Huh?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">Laura Ries has a great <a href="http://ries.typepad.com/ries_blog/2006/03/the_more_expens.html">article</a> about Wal-Mart testing a high-end store in Texas.  $500 bottles of wine at a Wal-Mart?  What’s the message here?  </p>
<p id="p2">This is especially interesting coming on the heels of her article about how to properly segment: Scion, Toyota, Lexus or Old Navy, Gap, Banana Republic.  Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart?  Don’t think so.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

