<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     >
  <channel>
    <title>Sirius Stuff</title>
    <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/</link>
    <description>A static blog engine/compiler</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:43:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Blogofile</generator>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <item>
      <title>What's not perfect with Blogofile</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/whats-not-perfect-with-blogofile</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:00:10 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/whats-not-perfect-with-blogofile</guid>
      <description>What's not perfect with Blogofile</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/>In <i><a href="http://www.siriusventures.com/switched-from-wordpress-to-blogofile" title="Switched from WordPress to Blogofile">Switched from WordPress to Blogofile</a></i> there are two good things about using <a title="blogofile" href="http://www.blogofile.com">Blogofile</a>:
<ul><li>flat files are almost impossible to hack</li>
<li><a title="amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/">Amazon</a>'s <a title="s3" href="http://aws.amazon.com/s3/">S3</a> (Simple Storage System) can scale incredibly high</li>
</ul><br/><br/>
There's some downsides:
<ul><li><i>blogofile build</i> seems to copy or regenerate every single file</li>
<li>it's not totally happy being on S3 - it doesn't make index.html files for the archive and category directories.  
</li><li>there's no easy way to post-via-email or send a link to start a post</li>
</ul><br/><br/>
Right now I'm writing this with vi and that's far less comfortable than WordPress's editor which I really liked.   But I'm sure I'll find TextWrangler or something as suitable for writing blog posts.
<br/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Switched from WordPress to Blogofile</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/switched-from-wordpress-to-blogofile</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:24:10 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/switched-from-wordpress-to-blogofile</guid>
      <description>Switched from WordPress to Blogofile</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/>I really like <a title="WordPress.com" href="http://www.wordpress.org">WordPress</a> for the huge number of themes and utilities that it has.   What I don't like, though, is the need for constant vigilance to make sure that your blog hasn't been hacked.  When I started the conversion, I found two blog posts that had been secretly altered so that they had links to spam sites.   I wasn't sure whether to be grateful that only two had been altered or disappointed that my blog mattered so little that that's all they did.
<br/><br/>
So it's with some relief that I've switched to <a title="blogofile" href="http://www.blogofile.com">Blogofile</a>, a python program that generates flat files that can be hosted on <a title="amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/">Amazon</a>'s <a title="s3" href="http://aws.amazon.com/s3/">S3</a> (Simple Storage System).   This has the advantage of being almost impossible to hack.  It also can scale even if this blog was featured on the front pages of <a title="digg" href="http://digg.com/">Digg</a> and <a title="reddit" href="http://www.reddit.com/">Reddit</a> and <a title="daring fireball" href="http://daringfireball.net">Daring Fireball</a> and <a title="slashdot" href="http://slashdot.org">Slashdot</a> and ...
<br/><br/>
Not that that's likely to happen little ol' me but it's comforting to think that everyone in the world could read my incredible prose.
<br/><br/>
Right now I'm writing this with vi and that's far less comfortable than WordPress's editor which I really liked.   But I'm sure I'll find TextWrangler or something as suitable for writing blog posts.
<br/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Twitter phishers are after your password</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/twitter-phishers-are-after-your-password/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:10:10 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/twitter-phishers-are-after-your-password/</guid>
      <description>Twitter phishers are after your password</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">I was burned by this one!  Graham Cluley writes a nice article on his blog called <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/10/28/twitter-phishers-password/">Twitter phishers are after your password </a></p>
<p id="p2">What was really appalling to me was getting burned by this screen:<br/>
<img id="image119" src="/site_img/tw-phishing-550.jpg" alt="Fake twitter login screen"/><br/>
Twitter, like Facebook, lets you use other sites by handling authorization.   I’d been having serious problems with Twitter not accepting my password (as were thousands of others, apparently) and it just got fixed last week.  So even though I was logged in and active on twitter.com, I wasn’t surprised to be prompted to login.  And I didn’t look closely enough at the URL.</p>
<p id="p3">Of course I wasn’t surprised to see this:<br/>
<img id="image120" src="/site_img/tw-over-capacity-550.jpg" alt="Fail whale - you've seen this"/><br/>
Takeaways?   Twitter has becoming more and more reliable.   They are fixing bugs.   And we all need to watch where we’re going - sometimes we think we’re someplace we’re not.  </p>
<p id="p4"><em>images courtesy of <a href="http://www.sophos.com">Sophos</a> I copied them so they won’t take their bandwidth or disappear if they change their links.</em> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OS X Style Google Reader</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/os-x-style-google-reader/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:06:06 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/os-x-style-google-reader/</guid>
      <description>OS X Style Google Reader</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">I’d referred to using CSS to make <a href="http://www.siriusventures.com/google-reader-optimized/">Google Reader look better</a>.  optimized <a href="http://userstyles.org/styles/2318">OS X Style Google Reader</a>  If you’re using <a href="http://www.google.com/reader">Google Reader</a>, this makes it much more usable.  The font’s better, it’s much prettier in layout, etc., etc.  Great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Official Google Reader Blog - There are people who don&#8217;t use feed readers?</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/official-google-reader-blog-there-are-people-who-dont-use-feed-readers/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 05:05:05 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/official-google-reader-blog-there-are-people-who-dont-use-feed-readers/</guid>
      <description>Official Google Reader Blog - There are people who don&#8217;t use feed readers?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">Do you use <a href="http://www.google.com/reader">Google Reader</a>?  I’ve thought that other readers were better beause they’re faster.  I really like <a href="http://www.rssowl.org">RSS Owl</a>, which uses IE to display pages.  It’s based on Java and is cross-platform, usable on Macs, Windows and Linux.  It uses one file to track what feeds you read.  I had been thinking </p>
<p id="p2">Problem is, there’s no standard way to show how far you’ve read in a newsfeed.  Articles are updated, the online services fetch them at different times - Google and Bloglines are online all the time but your RSS reader probably is not.  So I can’t easily keep offline readers in sync unless they’re hooked up to something to like <a href="http://www.newsgator.com/NGOLProduct.aspx?ProdID=FeedDemon">FeedDemon</a>.  That costs money, which would be OK, except that they have Mac and Windows (and BlackBerry) but no Linux.  Plus I don’t - or want to know - what their licensing scheme is.  If I have it on my laptop and my desktop, is that one instance?  It’s probably two.  </p>
<p id="p3">So I made the decision to stick with Google reader which also works on my Blackberry, though not in a great fashion.  </p>
<p id="p4">I’ve really not been happy with the way that they did “email an article”.  But they’ve introduced a new way of doing that and I’m much happier with their  implementation.  Hmmm.  I’d show you a screenshot except that I don’t know how to do that in Linux.  I will figure it out.<br/>
<a href="http://googlereader.blogspot.com/2007/05/there-are-people-who-dont-use-feed.html">Official Google Reader Blog: There are people who don’t use feed readers?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This is the way I&#8217;m feeling about technology, too</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/this-is-the-way-im-feeling-about-technology-too/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:03:03 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/this-is-the-way-im-feeling-about-technology-too/</guid>
      <description>This is the way I&#8217;m feeling about technology, too</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p1">I found Eric Sink’s blog via some references from <a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/">Joel Spolsky</a>’s blog.  This is a <a href="http://software.ericsink.com/entries/Technology_Dependence.html">nice post</a> about the problems with whiz-bang technology.  
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ouch! Apple gets it right on Vista</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/ouch-apple-gets-it-right-on-vista/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 02:02:02 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Home Computers]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/ouch-apple-gets-it-right-on-vista/</guid>
      <description>Ouch! Apple gets it right on Vista</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p1">Yesterday, I referenced what it was liking <a href="http://www.siriusventures.com/living-with-vista/">living with Vista</a></p>
<p id="p2">Today I ran across an <a href="http://images.apple.com/movies/us/apple/getamac/apple-getamac-security_480x376.mov">Apple ad</a> mocking Vista.   Unfortunately, they pretty much got it right.</p>
<p id="p3">I’m hoping for an update that fixes this.  Please, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/">Microsoft</a>?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Living with Vista</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/living-with-vista/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:02:02 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Home Computers]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/living-with-vista/</guid>
      <description>Living with Vista</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p1">OK, I’ve had Windows Vista installed for 9 days now and my verdict is … it’s not worth upgrading.  Vista is supposed to be more secure than XP but this manifests itself in really annoying ways.  The screen flashes black and a box pops up that must be dealt with.  That’d be great if it were only for important things but it happens <i>all the time</i>!</p>
<p id="p2">I’ve had it happen when I want to change the smallest system setting.  I’ve had it happen while downloading files.  C’mon, get out of my way.</p>
<p id="p3">I’m having trouble doing backups with Quicken.  Intuit probably had to do something so that they could force writes of data every time you changed something so that it wouldn’t be lost.  But wow, this was coming for a while.   </p>
<p id="p4">I wanted to look at Vista before thinking about Mac OS.  It’s tough, though, because you can get a 17″ HP or Dell laptop for $1000 less than a 17″ MacBook Pro.  Granted that it might take another $250-$300 to bring the laptops up to apples-to-Apples (heh) specs but that’s still a lot of money to spend on an OS.   Guess I could be one of the elite then, though.</p>
<p id="p5">Makes me wish for FreeBSD or Linux.  But I don’t really want to deal with an ugly, clunky windowing system as well having to reboot to run the few Windows programs I need.</p>
<p id="p6">
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Too many choices = problems</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/too-many-choices-problems/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:01:01 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Home Computers]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/too-many-choices-problems/</guid>
      <description>Too many choices = problems</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p1">I installed Vista on my home desktop machine on Friday.  I’ve already been bitten twice by the new “off” button with Vista.  I’m going to have to figure out how to change its default behavior.   </p>
<p id="p2">I enjoy reading Joel Spolsky’s articles.  In <a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/11/21.html">Choices = Headaches - Joel on Software</a> he talks about the problems with Vista:</p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/11/21vistaOff.PNG"/></div>
<p id="p3">
</p><blockquote>Every time you want to leave your computer, you have to choose between<br/>
nine, count them, nine options: two icons and seven menu items.</blockquote>
<p id="p4">He thinks that’s too many.  So do I.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Good article on online communities</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/good-article-on-online-communities/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:01:01 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/good-article-on-online-communities/</guid>
      <description>Good article on online communities</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p1">I’ve had this article on my hot list for a while.   In <a href="http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2006/10/human_scale_nei.html">/Message: Human Scale, Neighborhoods, and MySpaceaphobia</a> Stowe Boyd writes well about some of the issues with online sites like MySpace or Facebook and even proposes some solutions to the problems they have.<br/></p><blockquote>Human-oriented social contexts should allow users to control scale: how many people can access what aspects of my on-line persona, what sorts of communication are available based on what degree of connection, and so on. If I want to limit my profile on Facebook to only current students of my university, I should be able to do so. If I want to rectrict access to my music playing habits to only those people that I know, then Last.fm should allow me to.</blockquote>
<p id="p2">  Good stuff.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

