<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     >
  <channel>
    <title>Sirius Stuff</title>
    <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/</link>
    <description>A static blog engine/compiler</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:55:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Blogofile</generator>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <item>
      <title>Namebench for the win! Bad DNS makes my mac slow</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/namebench-for-the-win-bad-dns-makes-my-mac-slow</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:00:10 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/namebench-for-the-win-bad-dns-makes-my-mac-slow</guid>
      <description>Namebench for the win! Bad DNS makes my mac slow</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/>
Really bad performance on my MacBook has been driving me up the wall the past few days.   Closing all un-needed programs didn't help.  I ran several Mac utilities on my system, rebooted and so on and so forth.   
<br/><br/>
Still no good.
<br/><br/>
There's 8GB of RAM in my (latest model - fall 2010) white MacBook and that really sped things up when it replaced the stock 2GB.  It was very frustrating.
<br/><br/>
Activity Monitor (in your Application/Utilities folder) didn't reveal anything interesting.   Everything seemed slow, from opening a file with vi to browsing to a web page.
<br/><br/>
Searching for "slow mac" brought up references to pages loading slowly.  And that reminded me of <a href="http://code.google.com/p/namebench/" title="namebench">namebench</a>, a program that tests the fastest DNS servers for you.
<br/><br/>
Picking the fastest DNS servers isn't as simple as using <a href="http://www.opendns.com/" title="OpenDNS">OpenDNS</a> or Google's <a href="http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/" title="Google DNS">public DNS</a> because some sites like Netflix return different answers depending on where you are and what internet provider you're using.   What's right for OpenDNS may be much slower for you.
<br/><br/>
After running namebench, it detected that 75.75.75.75, the DNS provided by Comcast, my ISP, was not working.   Using the advice from namebench I put 3 different DNS providers into the router, including two other Comcast addresses and a Google Public DNS.
<br/><br/>
Today, it's like I have a new machine it's so fast.  Opening files is faster, browsing web pages is much faster, etc., etc.
<br/><br/>
Because of things like Dropbox or other background processes running, it seems like those slowed everything down, even something like vi on a local file.
<br/><br/>
So if your machine seems inexplicably slow, try using namebench and follow its advice.
<br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What's not perfect with Blogofile</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/whats-not-perfect-with-blogofile</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:00:10 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/whats-not-perfect-with-blogofile</guid>
      <description>What's not perfect with Blogofile</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/>In <i><a href="http://www.siriusventures.com/switched-from-wordpress-to-blogofile" title="Switched from WordPress to Blogofile">Switched from WordPress to Blogofile</a></i> there are two good things about using <a title="blogofile" href="http://www.blogofile.com">Blogofile</a>:
<ul><li>flat files are almost impossible to hack</li>
<li><a title="amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/">Amazon</a>'s <a title="s3" href="http://aws.amazon.com/s3/">S3</a> (Simple Storage System) can scale incredibly high</li>
</ul><br/><br/>
There's some downsides:
<ul><li><i>blogofile build</i> seems to copy or regenerate every single file</li>
<li>it's not totally happy being on S3 - it doesn't make index.html files for the archive and category directories.  
</li><li>there's no easy way to post-via-email or send a link to start a post</li>
</ul><br/><br/>
Right now I'm writing this with vi and that's far less comfortable than WordPress's editor which I really liked.   But I'm sure I'll find TextWrangler or something as suitable for writing blog posts.
<br/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Switched from WordPress to Blogofile</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/switched-from-wordpress-to-blogofile</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:24:10 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/switched-from-wordpress-to-blogofile</guid>
      <description>Switched from WordPress to Blogofile</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/>I really like <a title="WordPress.com" href="http://www.wordpress.org">WordPress</a> for the huge number of themes and utilities that it has.   What I don't like, though, is the need for constant vigilance to make sure that your blog hasn't been hacked.  When I started the conversion, I found two blog posts that had been secretly altered so that they had links to spam sites.   I wasn't sure whether to be grateful that only two had been altered or disappointed that my blog mattered so little that that's all they did.
<br/><br/>
So it's with some relief that I've switched to <a title="blogofile" href="http://www.blogofile.com">Blogofile</a>, a python program that generates flat files that can be hosted on <a title="amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/">Amazon</a>'s <a title="s3" href="http://aws.amazon.com/s3/">S3</a> (Simple Storage System).   This has the advantage of being almost impossible to hack.  It also can scale even if this blog was featured on the front pages of <a title="digg" href="http://digg.com/">Digg</a> and <a title="reddit" href="http://www.reddit.com/">Reddit</a> and <a title="daring fireball" href="http://daringfireball.net">Daring Fireball</a> and <a title="slashdot" href="http://slashdot.org">Slashdot</a> and ...
<br/><br/>
Not that that's likely to happen little ol' me but it's comforting to think that everyone in the world could read my incredible prose.
<br/><br/>
Right now I'm writing this with vi and that's far less comfortable than WordPress's editor which I really liked.   But I'm sure I'll find TextWrangler or something as suitable for writing blog posts.
<br/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Twitter phishers are after your password</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/twitter-phishers-are-after-your-password/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:10:10 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/twitter-phishers-are-after-your-password/</guid>
      <description>Twitter phishers are after your password</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">I was burned by this one!  Graham Cluley writes a nice article on his blog called <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/10/28/twitter-phishers-password/">Twitter phishers are after your password </a></p>
<p id="p2">What was really appalling to me was getting burned by this screen:<br/>
<img id="image119" src="/site_img/tw-phishing-550.jpg" alt="Fake twitter login screen"/><br/>
Twitter, like Facebook, lets you use other sites by handling authorization.   I’d been having serious problems with Twitter not accepting my password (as were thousands of others, apparently) and it just got fixed last week.  So even though I was logged in and active on twitter.com, I wasn’t surprised to be prompted to login.  And I didn’t look closely enough at the URL.</p>
<p id="p3">Of course I wasn’t surprised to see this:<br/>
<img id="image120" src="/site_img/tw-over-capacity-550.jpg" alt="Fail whale - you've seen this"/><br/>
Takeaways?   Twitter has becoming more and more reliable.   They are fixing bugs.   And we all need to watch where we’re going - sometimes we think we’re someplace we’re not.  </p>
<p id="p4"><em>images courtesy of <a href="http://www.sophos.com">Sophos</a> I copied them so they won’t take their bandwidth or disappear if they change their links.</em> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smart Google Reader Subscribe Button</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/smart-google-reader-subscribe-button/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:12:12 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/smart-google-reader-subscribe-button/</guid>
      <description>Smart Google Reader Subscribe Button</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">If you’re like most people, you’ve got more feeds in your news reader than you can keep up with.   What’s neat about this script is that it not only makes it easy to subscribe but also shows you if it’s already in your subscription list.   If it is, it’s shown with a checkmark over the RSS icon.  </p>
<p id="p2">My only objection is that it’s not posted to <a href="http://userscripts.org/">UserScripts</a>, a central repository for Greasemonkey scripts.</p>
<p id="p3"><a href="http://blog.persistent.info/2006/05/smart-google-reader-subscribe-button.html">Smart Google Reader Subscribe Button</a> is highly recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Greasefire - automatically find greasemonkey scripts</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/greasefire-automatically-find-greasemonkey-scripts/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:12:12 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/greasefire-automatically-find-greasemonkey-scripts/</guid>
      <description>Greasefire - automatically find greasemonkey scripts</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">This Greasemonky script <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8352">Greasefire :: Firefox Add-ons</a> looks interesting but it doesn’t run on Firefox 3.1 beta, which I’m running now.   I find the Greasemonkey scripts for Google Reader very helpful.</p>
<p id="p2">It’d be nice to look into later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google Reader - Colorful List View</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/google-reader-colorizer/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:12:12 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/google-reader-colorizer/</guid>
      <description>Google Reader - Colorful List View</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">If you’re like me and like to read your feeds sorted by tags, you’ll find yourself jumping from blog to blog.   Some Greasemonkey styles for Google Reader drop the feed name to save space, making it hard to tell articles apart.</p>
<p id="p2">Color is an efficient way to cue people that things are changing.   Unless you’re color-blind, I guess.   But since I’m not, I appreciate the <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/8782">Google Reader - Colorful List View</a> script because it makes it simple to tell that there’s different feeds.  </p>
<p id="p3"><em>Note: updated to show correct script</em>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Web 2.0 how-to design style guide</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/web-20-how-to-design-style-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 07:07:07 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/web-20-how-to-design-style-guide/</guid>
      <description>Web 2.0 how-to design style guide</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p id="p1">This seemed like a great article on how to develop modern-looking pages.  I barely know some of the HTML tags but <a href="http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/web-2.0-design-style-guide.cfm#star-flashes">Web 2.0 how-to design style guide</a> was clear with great screenshots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Excellent case study and analysis of HotOrNot</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/excellent-case-study-and-analysis-of-hotornot/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:11:11 PST</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Startups]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/excellent-case-study-and-analysis-of-hotornot/</guid>
      <description>Excellent case study and analysis of HotOrNot</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p1">Nisan Gabbay has an excellent analysis of the site at <a href="http://www.startup-review.com/blog/hotornotcom-case-study-mixing-free-and-premium-services.php">HOTorNOT.com Case Study: Mixing free and premium services</a></p>
<p id="p2">My wife and I celebrated our fifth wedding anniversary a few months<br/>
ago.  I’m happily married, so I haven’t visited HotOrNot in years.   I was fascinated by the description of the dating service, which I don’t think they offered when a friend first told me about the site.  </p>
<p id="p3">“Thus HOTorNOT was able to fill some pretty basic human needs in a way<br/>
that no other online service had before. This would later translate<br/>
into financial success once HOTorNOT offered its premium dating service<br/>
because their cost of customer acquisition was so low - zero. The<br/>
largest cost associated with operating a traditional online dating site<br/>
is the cost of customer acquisition, which even for successful sites<br/>
can be 50% (or more) of revenue. Because HOTorNOT attracted users with<br/>
its free rating service, it could offer its dating service for the low<br/>
price point of $6 per month. This is a price that traditional dating<br/>
sites can’t compete with because it generally takes $15-$30 to acquire<br/>
a subscriber for a traditional dating service.”</p>
<p id="p4">I wouldn’t think that advertising would be very appealing on the site except to a few advertisers like Budweiser.  So the idea of adding dating as a way to make money seems terrific.   As the article says:</p>
<p id="p5">“Pay $30 a month to troll through profiles? Hell no! Pay $6 to contact a<br/>
hot girl who already said she thinks I’m hot too? Probably.”</p>
<p id="p6">Neat to see somebody come up with a way to compete not only with the usual paid dating sites (Match, eHarmony, Yahoo) but also with <a href="http://www.craigslist.org/">Craigs List</a> and <a href="http://www.plentyoffish.com">PlentyOfFish</a>.</p>
<p id="p7">Can’t recommend this article - if you’re into web startups - highly enough.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Web at work? Use Workfriendly.</title>
      <link>http://www.siriusventures.com/web-at-work-use-workfriendly/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:08:08 PDT</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
      <guid>http://www.siriusventures.com/web-at-work-use-workfriendly/</guid>
      <description>Web at work? Use Workfriendly.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p1">Browsing at work and don’t want people to know?  <a href="http://www.workfriendly.net/">workFRIENDLY - BETA</a> makes your browser look like Microsoft Word.  Hopefully you don’t need to use this but nice implementation.</p>
<p id="p2">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/work" rel="tag">work</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/browser" rel="tag">browser</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

