<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Photography on Sirius Stuff</title>
    <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/tags/photography/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Photography on Sirius Stuff</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 05:05:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.siriusventures.com/tags/photography/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Photoshop Manipulation of Models</title>
      <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/photoshop-manipulation-of-models/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 05:05:05 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.siriusventures.com/photoshop-manipulation-of-models/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;David Pogue of the &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.nytimes.com&#34;&gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&#34;https://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=21&#34;&gt;writes&lt;/a&gt; about how images are manipulated with Photoshop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a dad with 2 young daughters, I find this kind of thing appalling.  The images in magazines are what some women (and men) compare themselves to.  How in the world can they justify this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Put me down for requiring a &amp;ldquo;altered by Photoshop&amp;rdquo; logo.  Or just prohibiting this altogether.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
