<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Productivity on Sirius Stuff</title>
    <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/tags/productivity/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Productivity on Sirius Stuff</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:12:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.siriusventures.com/tags/productivity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Smart Google Reader Subscribe Button</title>
      <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/smart-google-reader-subscribe-button/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:12:12 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.siriusventures.com/smart-google-reader-subscribe-button/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;re like most people, you&amp;rsquo;ve got more feeds in your news reader than you can keep up with.   What&amp;rsquo;s neat about this script is that it not only makes it easy to subscribe but also shows you if it&amp;rsquo;s already in your subscription list.   If it is, it&amp;rsquo;s shown with a checkmark over the RSS icon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My only objection is that it&amp;rsquo;s not posted to &lt;a href=&#34;https://userscripts.org/&#34;&gt;UserScripts&lt;/a&gt;, a central repository for Greasemonkey scripts.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google Reader - Colorful List View</title>
      <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/google-reader-colorizer/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:12:12 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.siriusventures.com/google-reader-colorizer/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;re like me and like to read your feeds sorted by tags, you&amp;rsquo;ll find yourself jumping from blog to blog.   Some Greasemonkey styles for Google Reader drop the feed name to save space, making it hard to tell articles apart.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Color is an efficient way to cue people that things are changing.   Unless you&amp;rsquo;re color-blind, I guess.   But since I&amp;rsquo;m not, I appreciate the &lt;a href=&#34;https://userscripts.org/scripts/show/8782&#34;&gt;Google Reader - Colorful List View&lt;/a&gt; script because it makes it simple to tell that there&amp;rsquo;s different feeds.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Note: updated to show correct script&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OS X Style Google Reader</title>
      <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/os-x-style-google-reader/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:06:06 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.siriusventures.com/os-x-style-google-reader/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;d referred to using CSS to &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.siriusventures.com/google-reader-optimized/&#34;&gt;make Google Reader look better&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;re using &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.google.com/reader&#34;&gt;Google Reader&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#34;https://userstyles.org/styles/2318&#34;&gt;OS X Style Google Reader&lt;/a&gt; makes it much more usable.  The font&amp;rsquo;s better, it&amp;rsquo;s much prettier in layout, etc., etc.  Great stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google Reader Optimized</title>
      <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/google-reader-optimized/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:06:06 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.siriusventures.com/google-reader-optimized/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been using Google Reader more and more.  I&amp;rsquo;m not thrilled with the layout, so I was really pleased to see that I could modify it either using the &lt;a href=&#34;https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2108/&#34;&gt;Stylish FireFox Extension&lt;/a&gt; or via &lt;a href=&#34;https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748&#34;&gt;Greasemonkey&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&#34;https://userstyles.org/styles/1236&#34;&gt;Google Reader Optimized&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I started out with Stylish but am trying to cut down on the number of extensions I have.  Of course, whether it&amp;rsquo;s better to have it as a Greasemonkey script seems more open to problems than an extension.   You&amp;rsquo;re one level away from the scripts and they don&amp;rsquo;t go through the official Mozilla check-in process.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bookmarks Power up Firefox with keywords - Lifehacker</title>
      <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/bookmarks-power-up-firefox-with-keywords-lifehacker/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 05:05:05 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.siriusventures.com/bookmarks-power-up-firefox-with-keywords-lifehacker/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have this working on my laptop.  But I have to remember to get it going on my desktop machine.  That&amp;rsquo;s the only problem with having two machines - even with Google&amp;rsquo;s browser sync it&amp;rsquo;s hard to keep the FireFox configurations absolutely identical.  &lt;a href=&#34;https://lifehacker.com/software/bookmarks/power-up-firefox-with-keywords-248451.php&#34;&gt;Bookmarks: Power up Firefox with keywords - Lifehacker&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hack Attack - Firefox and the art of keyword bookmarking</title>
      <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/hack-attack-firefox-and-the-art-of-keyword-bookmarking/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 05:05:05 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.siriusventures.com/hack-attack-firefox-and-the-art-of-keyword-bookmarking/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Another article on FireFox and bookmarks.  &lt;a href=&#34;https://lifehacker.com/software/bookmarks/hack-attack-firefox-and-the-art-of-keyword-bookmarking-196779.php&#34;&gt;Firefox and the art of keyword bookmarking&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to choose the right screenshot program</title>
      <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/how-to-choose-the-right-screenshot-program/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 05:05:05 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.siriusventures.com/how-to-choose-the-right-screenshot-program/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I need to get pictures of screens for reporting problems.  I don&amp;rsquo;t usually want to take the full screen or even a window - I want the smallest section that will show the problem.  Using Ubuntu, I wasn&amp;rsquo;t able to find anything that would do it as easily as I would like.  I&amp;rsquo;m guessing with some certainty that I could have rigged The Gimp or something to capture the screen but then I would have to work at reducing the size, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Official Google Reader Blog - There are people who don&#39;t use feed readers?</title>
      <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/official-google-reader-blog-there-are-people-who-dont-use-feed-readers/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 05:05:05 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.siriusventures.com/official-google-reader-blog-there-are-people-who-dont-use-feed-readers/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Do you use &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.google.com/reader&#34;&gt;Google Reader&lt;/a&gt;?  I&amp;rsquo;ve thought that other readers were better beause they&amp;rsquo;re faster.  I really like &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.rssowl.org&#34;&gt;RSS Owl&lt;/a&gt;, which uses IE to display pages.  It&amp;rsquo;s based on Java and is cross-platform, usable on Macs, Windows and Linux.  It uses one file to track what feeds you read.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Problem is, there&amp;rsquo;s no standard way to show how far you&amp;rsquo;ve read in a newsfeed.  Articles are updated, the online services fetch them at different times - Google and Bloglines are online all the time but your RSS reader probably is not.  So I can&amp;rsquo;t easily keep offline readers in sync unless they&amp;rsquo;re hooked up to something to like &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.newsgator.com/NGOLProduct.aspx?ProdID=FeedDemon&#34;&gt;FeedDemon&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Firefox - Open diverted links in new background tab instead of new window</title>
      <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/firefox-open-diverted-links-in-new-background-tab-instead-of-new-window/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 05:05:05 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.siriusventures.com/firefox-open-diverted-links-in-new-background-tab-instead-of-new-window/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I really like to be able to click on links while reading an article but not have to deal with the links until I&amp;rsquo;m done.  I&amp;rsquo;ve got enough ADD issues without tabs popping up.  So I was very happy to find this reference to making tabs work better (for me, anyway): &lt;a href=&#34;https://teuton.blogspot.com/2004/12/firefox-open-diverted-links-in-new.html&#34;&gt;Firefox: Open diverted links in new background tab instead of new window&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s kind of an adjustment process because FF is relatively &amp;ldquo;quiet&amp;rsquo; - the tabs are opening all the way to the right and not grabbing attention.  Just the way I&amp;rsquo;ve wanted but it&amp;rsquo;s a little unnerving - I&amp;rsquo;m checking to make sure the tabs did open.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Great post on web design - Yahoo vs Google</title>
      <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/great-post-on-web-design-yahoo-vs-google/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 06:06:06 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.siriusventures.com/great-post-on-web-design-yahoo-vs-google/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Really liked the article &lt;a href=&#34;https://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2006-05-21-n50.html&#34;&gt;Is Google Badly Designed?&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&#34;https://blog.outer-court.com/&#34;&gt;Google Blogoscoped&lt;/a&gt;. He talks about the design considerations with Yahoo and Google and their home pages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I thought it was interesting that Google was viewed as &amp;ldquo;friendly&amp;rdquo; because of its simplicity.  Clearly Yahoo puts a lot of information on its page but it also feels very corporate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From what I read, Google is having trouble getting people to use its other features.  It&amp;rsquo;d be interesting to know what to degree this is because they&amp;rsquo;re not displayed the way that Yahoo&amp;rsquo;s are &amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Good summary of what Google Base means to vertical web sites</title>
      <link>https://www.siriusventures.com/good-summary-of-what-google-base-means-to-vertical-web-sites/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 05:05:05 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.siriusventures.com/good-summary-of-what-google-base-means-to-vertical-web-sites/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Bill Burnham has a nice &lt;a href=&#34;https://billburnham.blogs.com/burnhamsbeat/2006/04/real_estate_car.html&#34;&gt;summary&lt;/a&gt; of what Google Base in general and the &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=homes+for+sale&amp;amp;btnG=Google+Search&#34;&gt;real estate&lt;/a&gt; section in particular might mean for vertical web sites like &lt;a href=&#34;trulia.com&#34;&gt;Trulia&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s not a lot of fun competing in a section where Google is competing.  I can vouch for that first hand.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
